**Royalist: Prince Harry's Case is Really Strong, ANL/Mail "Could be in Real Trouble Here"**

Prince Harry's lawsuit against the British press has taken a significant turn, with his case looking increasingly strong. The Duke of Sussex was spotted arriving and departing from the Royal Court of Justice on Monday, where he will spend all week testifying against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publishers of the Daily Mail.

As Harry made his way through the crowded courthouse, photographers couldn't help but notice how dashing he looked. With his signature Freedom Strut and perfectly tailored suits, it's no wonder he always looks amazing in court. When asked about the first day of proceedings, Harry simply replied, "Good, very good."

But while Harry may have been calm and collected, his lawyers were busy laying out a damning case against ANL. According to sources, David Sherborne, Harry's barrister, presented a highly detailed argument that highlighted the publishers' alleged use of unlawful information gathering (UIG) methods over two decades.

Sherborne's opening salvo focused on the Leveson Inquiry, where senior Mail executives had emphatically denied any wrongdoing. However, he revealed that these denials were "false" and that ANL had engaged in a systematic and sustained use of UIG to gather information about Harry and other high-profile individuals.

One particular revelation caught many by surprise: the extent to which ANL's journalists, including Katie Nicholl and Rebecca English, relied on private investigators to obtain sensitive information. Sherborne produced evidence of an email chain between a PI called Mike Behr and English, in which Behr gloated about having obtained Chelsy Davy's flight details, complete with seat number.

English had previously claimed not to remember the email or how she had obtained the information, but Sherborne's expert analysis revealed that she had thanked "Mike" for his efforts and discussed payment. This bombshell has left many wondering if ANL can salvage their case.

Tom Sykes, a prominent royal reporter and Substack writer, was present in court on Monday and has been following the proceedings closely. In an exclusive piece, he noted that despite initial skepticism about Harry's case, he now believes ANL "could be in real trouble here."

The so-called "skeleton argument" of the claimants and ANL's response was also released today, with Harry himself stating: "I find it deeply troubling that Associated used phrases such as 'sources', 'friends', and the like to hide unlawful information gathering. I find it shocking to learn from disclosure that Associated were even using Mike Behr to blag my flight details as late as 2014 for work that he did not even want to put into writing."

ANL's defense, of course, is that all the information was obtained through legitimate means – namely, leaks from friends. However, this argument is likely to face intense scrutiny in court, particularly given the wealth of evidence presented by Harry's lawyers.

The trial is expected to be a high-stakes showdown between two of Britain's most powerful institutions: the royal family and the press. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story!