Trump's "Best Security People" Can't Figure Out Basic Security

In a stunning display of incompetence, President Trump's so-called "best security people" have been left flummoxed by some of the most basic security protocols. Despite their lofty claims of expertise, these individuals have managed to botch even the simplest of security measures, leaving many to wonder if they're truly up to the task.

The latest incident involved a top-secret meeting that was allegedly compromised by an individual who breached the OpSec (Operational Security) protocols. For those unfamiliar with the term, OpSec refers to the set of procedures put in place to protect sensitive information and prevent unauthorized disclosure. It's the kind of thing you'd expect seasoned security professionals to master without breaking a sweat.

However, it seems that even the President's top advisors are not immune to the pitfalls of basic security. When asked about the incident, one source described the situation as " absolute chaos". Another insider revealed that the individual responsible for the breach was actually someone who had been vetted and cleared by the very same security team that failed to prevent it.

"It's like they're playing a game of 'security roulette'," said one former White House staffer. "They're rolling the dice on basic OpSec protocols, hoping that no one will notice when things go wrong. But the fact is, it doesn't matter how many billions of dollars you spend on security, if you don't have competent people in place, it's all for naught."

The incident has left many to question whether President Trump's "best security people" are actually fit for their jobs. With such a critical role at stake, one would think that even the slightest lapse in judgment would result in immediate consequences. But it seems that the rules of engagement don't quite apply to these high-ranking officials.

"If you're not careful with your OpSec protocols, it's like waving a red flag in front of enemy agents," said another insider. "It's basic common sense, but I guess some people just aren't wired for this kind of work." While the President's security team may be able to pass the entrance exams for high-clearance jobs, when it comes down to the nitty-gritty of actual security protocols, they seem woefully unprepared.

As one insider so aptly put it: "OpSec failures this bad should result in people not only losing their security clearances and jobs, but even the right to work a job more complicated than 'janitor'." If that's not a ringing endorsement of basic competence, what is?

The incident raises serious questions about the state of national security under President Trump's leadership. How can we trust our leaders to protect us when they can't even be trusted with the most basic of security protocols? The answer, much like the President's security team, remains a mystery.